
Democrats = Copperheads?
October 26, 2007Occasionally I browse through Wikipedia for fun. Understanding its editorial process, I know not to assume everything written in there is fair, non-partisan or accurate. But, it is a great place to gather initial research and provide a starting point for further research.
Today I stumbled upon a piece of history that might describe today’s events if we changes some of the words slightly…
During the
American Civil War (1861-1865)Iraq War, theCopperheadsDemocrats nominally favored the Union but strongly opposed the war, for which they blamedabolitionistsRumsfeld, Cheney and Rice, and they demanded immediate peace and resisted draftlawsfunding. They wantedLincolnBush and the Republicans ousted from power, seeing the president as a tyrant who was destroying Americanrepublicandemocratic values with his despotic and arbitrary actions.Some
CopperheadsDemocrats tried to persuadeUnionsoldiers to desert. They talked of helpingConfederateIraqi/Al Qaeda prisoners of war seize their camps and escape. They sometimes met withConfederateIslamic Radical agents and took money. TheConfederacyIslamic Radicals encouraged their activities whenever possible.[1]MostSome Democratic party leaders, however, repelledConfederateIslamic Fundamentalist advances.
I found the similarities between the Copperheads and Democrats amazingly close. But back in the 1800’s, groups like the Copperheads were handled much differently.
The Copperheads sometimes talked of violent resistance, and in some cases started to organize. They never actually made an organized attack, though. As war opponents, Copperheads were suspected of disloyalty, and Lincoln often had their leaders arrested and held for months in military prisons without trial.
Anyway, maybe the comparison is a stretch, but I still found it all quite similar to today’s current events.




[...] post by Ham This was written by . Posted on Friday, October 26, 2007, at 5:25 pm. Filed under Politics. [...]